But the vast majority of the time, it fails with an Out of Memory error. Occasionally, if I flatten the panorama, then purge all cache, it MAY successfully do the fill. Occasionally, if Photoshop is not up, and sending the images from Lightroom starts it, it MAY successfully do the fill. And, of course, the fill fails with an "Out of Memory" popup. It appears to have been processed, but didn’t create the final layer. Some of the time, the panorama will succeed, but I will NOT get the new “unnamed” panorama layer, just the original 5 images with the masks. Photoshop loads the 5 images, creates the panorama, but FAILS on the fill with an “Out of Memory” popup. Specify “Reposition” (or Auto) and Content-aware fill empty areas. Send a small panorama from Lightroom to Photoshop – 5, D850 images. Specifically, running in normal environment with Lightroom and Photoshop running, and a few other things that use far less memory than either. I frequently have a problem with Photoshop saying it is out of memory. Desktop also has Photoshop 22.5.3, but the same thing happens, so not relevant. Photoshop is 23.0.1, Lightroom Classic is V11. I’ll stick to the desktop since that’s what I’m processing on at the moment. Around 600 GB of scratch space available.īoth systems have had the normal “Making Photoshop run better” and “Making Lightroom run better” sorts of modifications. ![]() Laptop is a Dell 7740, 32GB of memory, Quadro RTX 3000, SSDs for everything. The GPU has “Anti-Alias Guides” on, and OpenCL has been on and off – no difference.Ĭache is set to “Large pixel dimensions” with 6 levels and 1024K tile sizeĮfficiency, even when displaying the “Out of Memory” error, is ALWAYS 100%. A couple terabytes of space available on scratch disks. Hopefully, someone here will have some ideas.ĭesktop is a normal PC, Windows 10 Pro, 32GB of memory, AMD 5700XT 8GB, SSDs for everything. Otherwise you could order Luminar NEO with a discount of 10,– € and the code TUXOCHE.I'm not getting much useful in the Photoshop forum. Skylum just needs to improve the times considerably and also reduce the cropping on the images when bicolor alignment is needed. The results delivered by the focus stacking extension are fine. Helikon Focus also does a better job here. If the image is assembled without alignment of the different partial images, the size is correct, but the result is not usable. Sometimes there were differences of 200-400px on the longer edge, When creating the comparison images, I noticed that the Luminar result was always smaller in its dimensions than the image created by Helicon Focus. In my opinion, this can no longer be explained by Beta. The mushroom image above, consisting of 22 individual shots takes 22 seconds in Helikon Focus, while in Luminar NEO you need more than 2 minutes. The focus stacking extension is incredibly slow. The downerĮven though it is a beta version with the Luminar extension. The difference is practically indistinguishable and if you don’t value the additional possibilities Helicon Focus offers, but simply the result as it can be achieved with standard settings, then both are equal. The finished can be saved as Tiff or DNG and also already shared on different platforms. It’s not critical now, but you have more intervention options with Helikon Fokus. Here, however, you can see the process of how Helicon Focus assembles the different focus layers. These can be either Tiff files or RAW files. With Helicon Focus the single images are also loaded into the program. ![]() ![]() There should be an option to choose the location or at least to store it in the original folder. However, this album is also stored in the user’s profile in the C: drive, just like HDR Merge. Of course you can then process them further, either with Luminar NEO or any other program. The images are then listed as shown here and then the individual images are added together.Īs with the HDR extension, the finished images are collected in an automatically created album and saved as a Tiff file. You can only align the single shots, which is recommended, and also remove the chromatic aberration. The extension doesn’t offer much in the way of settings. There is of course also with other objects, flowers or jewelry are there grateful motifs. To try it out, I took mushroom pictures of course adapted to the season, where I took several pictures with different photos with an app.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |